[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNUstep on Windows, "desktop" bundles...
From: |
Wim Oudshoorn |
Subject: |
Re: GNUstep on Windows, "desktop" bundles... |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Oct 2004 22:00:03 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (darwin) |
Alex Perez <aperez@student.santarosa.edu> writes:
> On Wed, 20 Oct 2004, Larry Cow wrote:
>
>> Alex Perez a écrit :
> gdomap definately needs to be servicized if it is going to be used (alexms
> patch removes this requirement) because it requires administrative privs
> to bind to ports.
Hm, I never tried Alex's patch. But as far as I know this patch
did not work under windows anyway.
>
> IMHO GNUstep should be installed into C:\Program Files\GNUstep. People do
> not install it there because of the whole "space issue" but that space
> issue is rendered irrelevant because NTFS retains the old 8-char
> filenames. With this in mind, installing to C:\Progra~1\GNUstep is
> perfectly safe.
Well, there are two parts for the space issue.
(1) Deployment of GNUstep.
(2) Building the GNUstep libraries themselves.
(or building in general).
For (1) spaces are not a problem.
For (2) I think there is a problem. It is not without a reason
that the readme of the windows installer warns against spaces
in the path.
>> Maybe this should be added on the wiki and brought to wider discussion
>> (though I thinkmost gnustepers read this list)?
> Good idea. Want to start one?
I do read the list, but not the wiki.
>>
>> >IMHO there should probably just be one installer, with some radios for
>> >developer/runtime and also base/gui, unless there is a size issue.
>> >
The option to install either the developer or runtime version
is quite doable.
We already have a version which can install a precompiled base.
(some tiny hacks to fixup some paths during installation.)
This functionality was added by Tom Koelman, and I will ask
the details when he is back from holiday.
So a deployment version of base is very doable. We have not
put effort in making a pure deployment installer because at the moment
I can not see what good a deployment installer is.
(AFAIK there are no precompiled GNUstep applications available for
windows, so you need to compile the GNUstep applications anyway).
>> >
>> Unless the thing gets too big, that's probably better.
In this thread a question was raised how big the installer
becomes when it needs a complete mingw system etc.
Well, look at the current base installer, it just contains that:-)
(and it is about 10Mb)
Oh and as a final remark. If someone can post
instructions for compile gui which will work ;-(
I think Tom or myself will extend the current
installer to include gui as well.
Note however that I definitely do not have the time,
nor motivation to figure out how to get gui working
under windows. (I know I most probably can and
that the problems we encountered last time we tried
are probably very easy to solve, but I am really busy).
Wim Oudshoorn.
- Re: GNUstep on Windows, "desktop" bundles..., (continued)
- Re: GNUstep on Windows, "desktop" bundles..., Andreas Hoeschler, 2004/10/20
- Re: GNUstep on Windows, "desktop" bundles..., Larry Cow, 2004/10/20
- Re: GNUstep on Windows, "desktop" bundles..., Alex Perez, 2004/10/20
- Re: GNUstep on Windows, "desktop" bundles..., Larry Cow, 2004/10/20
- Re: GNUstep on Windows, "desktop" bundles..., Alex Perez, 2004/10/20
- Re: GNUstep on Windows, "desktop" bundles..., Larry Cow, 2004/10/20
- Re: GNUstep on Windows, "desktop" bundles..., Alex Perez, 2004/10/20
- Re: GNUstep on Windows, "desktop" bundles..., David Ayers, 2004/10/21
- Re: GNUstep on Windows, "desktop" bundles..., Alex Perez, 2004/10/21
- Re: GNUstep on Windows, "desktop" bundles..., Alex Perez, 2004/10/21
- Re: GNUstep on Windows, "desktop" bundles...,
Wim Oudshoorn <=
Re: GNUstep on Windows, "desktop" bundles..., David Wetzel, 2004/10/20