[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration
From: |
Richard Frith-Macdonald |
Subject: |
Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration |
Date: |
Sat, 15 Oct 2005 13:09:11 +0000 |
My 'vote', for what it's worth, is to stick with CVS for a while.
I don't want to get dragged in to the discussion on this, but ...
1. I don't think that the flaws in CVS are causing people a great deal of
difficulty in practice or holding back GNUstep development.
2. I don't see a clear winner for which system we should migrate to...
opinoins are very varied and I don't have the experience myself.
So, while I have no objection to someone putting in all the practical work
to do a move (as long as they make it easy for developers like me to make
the change), it seems to me that there is not a lot of urgency, and it looks
like the field of version control systems is in a state of flux, so a wait
and see approach seems sensible.
By a 'while' I mean something like waiting six months and then revisting the
topic.
- Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration, (continued)
Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration, Roland Schwingel, 2005/10/13
Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration, Christopher Armstrong, 2005/10/14
Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration, MJ Ray, 2005/10/14
Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration, MJ Ray, 2005/10/14
Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration,
Richard Frith-Macdonald <=