[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Cocotron
From: |
Gregory John Casamento |
Subject: |
Re: Cocotron |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Dec 2006 12:25:44 -0800 (PST) |
I'm not sure. That is what their website says, but, like you said... from
looking at their code, it doesn't look like they can currently work on
non-Windows operating systems. I didn't test this, but I saw the same thing
your describing.
GJC
--
Gregory Casamento
## GNUstep Chief Maintainer
----- Original Message ----
From: Adrian Robert <arobert@cogsci.ucsd.edu>
To: Discuss-GNUStep GNUstep <discuss-gnustep@gnu.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 3:16:44 PM
Subject: Re: Cocotron
On Dec 28, 2006, at 2:54 PM, Gregory John Casamento wrote:
> Yen-Ju,
>
> RFM and I wrote the author and his feeling was that it was mainly
> the license and that he and others felt like GNUstep wasn't meeting
> the goal that they wanted, which was, as Cocotron demonstrates, to
> be able to cross-compile apps from OS X to Windows, Linux or others.
Incidentally, what exactly was their plan for non-Windows OS's? I
looked at the code briefly and saw lots of W32 calls embedded
everywhere. I guess maybe they could throw the whole thing on top of
WINE, at the cost of some performance hit..
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnustep mailing list
Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
- Re: Cocotron, (continued)
- Re: Cocotron, Oliver Langer, 2006/12/26
- Message not available
Re: Cocotron, Gregory John Casamento, 2006/12/28
Re: Cocotron, Gregory John Casamento, 2006/12/28
Re: Cocotron,
Gregory John Casamento <=
Re: Cocotron, Gregory John Casamento, 2006/12/28
Re: Cocotron, Gregory John Casamento, 2006/12/29
Re: Cocotron, address@hidden, 2006/12/29
Re: Cocotron, Gregory John Casamento, 2006/12/30
Re: Cocotron, Gregory John Casamento, 2006/12/30