discuss-gnustep
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GNUstep Web browser (was Re: WebKit Bounty)


From: Thom Cherryhomes
Subject: Re: GNUstep Web browser (was Re: WebKit Bounty)
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 18:00:43 -0500

*shakes-head*

*walks-away*


On 3/3/07, Riccardo <multix@ngi.it> wrote:
Hi,

On Friday, March 2, 2007, at 09:29 PM, hns@computer.org wrote:

> I think it is worth to mention SimpleWebKit here - a rough
> implementation of
> WebView, WebFrame, WebFrameView, WebDataSource etc. - completely
> written
> in Objective-C without any C++. The reason is that it must cross-
> compile
> on gcc 2.95.3 for some ARM processors.

I think it is a pretty good idea. If done well it should end up in a
cleaner implementation than apple's and also more manageable. Of course
it will never reach the completeness of WebKit, since even WebKit pales
compared to Gecko. But it could end up being more portable, more
efficient and what is good even a good option since you say ti is a
reimplementation. As I read it, one browser could use one or the other
without big effort.
It could be used in a light-browser as well as in applications were an
embedded HTML/XHTML engine is needed.

Of course it should en handling real-world pages decently, but before
worrying of that (links does it and even dillo improved a little) it
should display correct pages correctly. The rest is added "burden"
actually.

Would you consider signing FSF and making it LGPL available in gnustep?

-Ric



_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnustep mailing list
Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]