[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Was GNUstep ready for GNUstep ?
From: |
Riccardo |
Subject: |
RE: Was GNUstep ready for GNUstep ? |
Date: |
Tue, 01 May 2007 12:06:17 +0200 |
User-agent: |
GNUMail (Version 1.2.0) |
Hi,
I think Nicola writes some wise stuff. As a GAP developer with limited
time, I can't check always all the Applications on all Releases... so
I may not even be aware of a certain problem.
Contacting the authors is a good thing!
On 2007-04-30 00:45:11 +0200 "Nicola Pero"
<nicola.pero@meta-innovation.com> wrote:
Thanks Yves ... a few comments:
0. yes, you should upgrade! :-)
1. if you find something that is not ready for gnustep-make 2.x, fix
it and
submit patches to the authors ;-)
<snip>
3. if you can't fix an external software, I'll fix it for you. Just
send me
the code / a link to the code :-)
and Nicola, bse sure to contact the authors :)
Finally, ProjectCenter is particularly difficult because it's not
just a
matter
of compiling the program, but the program itself is
creating/maintaining
makefiles.
I guess I'll slowly update/fix it as reports come in.
Yes. This is a very important point. I use ProjectCenter for almost
everything if I am able to use it. If ProjectCenter generates
"outdated" makefiles or anyway wrong makefiles, it is a big problem.
Patches to the makefile will be just overwritten by the automated
generator.
I think the ProjectCenter could need a minor release which updates it
to compatibility in both compilation of itself i f necessary as well
as the makefiles it creates. This should be done soon and without
waiting for furhter stuff to be released. Just a maintainance release.
Thanks,
Riccardo
- RE: Was GNUstep ready for GNUstep ?,
Riccardo <=