[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [FOSDEM] Accepted devrooms
From: |
Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller |
Subject: |
Re: [FOSDEM] Accepted devrooms |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:25:01 +0200 |
Hi Gerold,
Am 25.10.2012 um 13:17 schrieb Gerold Rupprecht:
> Hi Lars,
>
> Thanks for your efforts.
>
> Can you say anything about the selection criteria?
I had submitted a request for a devroom for another project and got almost
verbatim the same answer. There is no clear statement about rules, except:
>>> Our goal is to stimulate developer
>>> collaboration and cross-pollination between projects.
So I think a single project or even several has lower chances than a "topic".
And, available space is always an important criterion.
>
> We have enjoyed FOSDEM presence since the beginning so I am interested
> to know why the organizers are giving preference to others. What can we
> do to make our project have greater value for FOSDEM?
I think with these criteria mentioned above, we can do nothing. We can't
transform
our project into a "general topic". We can only organize our own
"mini-conference".
> These people are putting in a tremendous effort at organizing, finding
> sponsors, volonteers and I really appreciate their efforts. It has
> always been a highlight for me to meet other people interested in
> GNUstep each year at FOSDEM.
Well, from the organizer's viewpoint we can still do that. Just not in a devroom
provided by them.
> One thing that comes to mind is the often difficult access to our code
> within various distributions /OSs. The code which is available has often
> been in a frustrating state where getting the code up and running.
>
> Are reviewers finding it difficult and time-consuming?
>
> What are the FOSDEM organizers looking at?
I don't think they are looking into any code.
>
> We have even had the support of Richard Stallman for our project, so I
> am still convinced GNUstep has strategic value for Free Software.
Yes, but it is one of >20 (or more) strategic projects. I don't see any other
FSF project
on the list of the accepted devrooms (I may have missed it).
>
> What are the other projects doing that presents them as being a better
> investment for their time and resources than our project?
They address a broader audience. Look, not even Debian or Fedora
has its own devroom. They have to share "Cross Distro".
FOSDEM has simply grown faster than the audience of our project...
>
> Can we set a priority to fill in the gaps to again meet their
> standards?
>
> I have great admiration for the current and past contributors to GNUstep
> and the overall quality of work. We have had investments from Google
> summer of code for a number of contributions, so technically, I have no
> doubt as to the value of the produced code.
>
> The current efforts to creating debian packaging that is more current is
> a good move in the right direction (big thanks to all contributors).
> Would more automatic regression tests be of help to get better ratings?
FOSDEM does IMHO only look into importance of a topic for mankind.
>
> Any thoughts and suggestions would be most welcome.
>
> Would it be appropriate for us to graft ourselves onto the Testing and
> Automation group (Saturday) or the Configuration / Systems Management
> group (Sunday) this year?
>
> What is the interest to organize a meeting nearby to FOSDEM?
This has crossed over with my other proposal for getting a conference
room @ some hotel nearby :)
> I really want to see GNUstep at FOSDEM again.
And I want to meet the GNUsteppers during FOSDEM time :)
>
> All comments and suggestions welcome.
>
> Thanks,
Nikolaus
>
>
> Gerold
> --
> Gerold Rupprecht
> 10, rue Louis-Curval
> CH-1206 Genève, Suisse
>
> Mobile: +41 79 914 29 52
>
> On jeu, 2012-10-25 at 12:29 +0200, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf wrote:
>> Sadly we are not among them :-(
>>
>>
>> Lars
>>
>> Anfang der weitergeleiteten E-Mail:
>>
>>> Von: fosdem-request@lists.fosdem.org
>>>
>>> Datum: 25. Oktober 2012 12:00:01 MESZ
>>>
>>> An: fosdem@lists.fosdem.org
>>>
>>> Betreff: FOSDEM Digest, Vol 66, Issue 2
>>>
>>> Antwort an: fosdem@lists.fosdem.org
>>>
>>>
>>> Send FOSDEM mailing list submissions to
>>> fosdem@lists.fosdem.org
>>>
>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>> https://lists.fosdem.org/listinfo/fosdem
>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>> fosdem-request@lists.fosdem.org
>>>
>>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>> fosdem-owner@lists.fosdem.org
>>>
>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>> than "Re: Contents of FOSDEM digest..."
>>> Today's Topics:
>>>
>>> 1. Accepted devrooms (Tias Guns)
>>>
>>> Von: Tias Guns <tias@fosdem.org>
>>>
>>> Datum: 24. Oktober 2012 21:27:48 MESZ
>>>
>>> An: Fosdem Announce <fosdem@lists.fosdem.org>
>>>
>>> Betreff: [FOSDEM] Accepted devrooms
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Devrooms are 'developer rooms' in which open source communities can
>>> organize their own schedule, made of presentations, brainstorming
>>> and hacking sessions. Our goal is to stimulate developer
>>> collaboration and cross-pollination between projects.
>>>
>>> It is our pleasure and honor to announce that the following projects
>>> and topics have been granted a devroom at FOSDEM 2013:
>>>
>>> Both Days
>>> ---------
>>> * Cross Distro
>>> * CrossDesktop
>>> * Embedded and Mobile
>>> * Free Java
>>> * Legal Issues
>>> * Mozilla
>>>
>>> Saturday
>>> --------
>>> * Apache OpenOffice
>>> * Community development and Marketing
>>> * FOSS for scientists
>>> * Graph Processing
>>> * Jabber/XMPP
>>> * Microkernels / Component-based OSes
>>> * Mono
>>> * PHP and Friends
>>> * Testing and Automation
>>> * The Wine Project
>>> * Virtualization
>>> * X.org
>>>
>>> Sunday
>>> ------
>>> * Ada
>>> * BSD
>>> * Cloud
>>> * Configuration/Systems Management
>>> * Cross Distro
>>> * LibreOffice
>>> * MySQL & Friends
>>> * NOSQL
>>> * Open Source Game Development
>>> * PostgreSQL
>>> * Python
>>> * Smalltalk
>>> * Telephony
>>>
>>>
>>> In the coming weeks, they will announce their call for talks on
>>> various mailinglists (including this one). We will collect them on
>>> our website as well.
>>>
>>> We will also open our call for stands (a place in the hallway) and
>>> lightningtalks (15 minute talks) in the coming week.
>>>
>>>
>>> On behalf of the FOSDEM program team,
>>> Tias
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> FOSDEM mailing list
>>> FOSDEM@lists.fosdem.org
>>> https://lists.fosdem.org/listinfo/fosdem
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss-gnustep mailing list
>> Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnustep mailing list
> Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep