[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: draft of a new Open Source Commercial License
From: |
Pirmin Braun |
Subject: |
Re: draft of a new Open Source Commercial License |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Sep 2013 16:45:55 +0200 |
Am Wed, 18 Sep 2013 14:34:18 +0100
schrieb David Chisnall <theraven@sucs.org> :
> On 18 Sep 2013, at 13:57, Markus Hitter <mah@jump-ing.de> wrote:
>
> > Perhaps this distinction is too complex. Non-commercial use -> free,
> > commercial use -> pay. Things have to be simple.
>
> Non-commercial use is a sticky point, especially for web apps. For example,
> if I run a free service that runs the web app and allows anyone to use it, am
> I commercial? What happens if I put ads on it? What about if the ads are
> only covering the cost of hosting it? The FSF web site has a lot of text
> about the problems with NC licenses, so I won't bother reiterating them.
>
I knew this would come. It's the 0,1 % of all cases that make things
complicated.
We just won't hunt after them. If in doubt, you're allowed. If obviously
cheating, we'll find out. Sooner or later.
--
Pirmin Braun - IntarS Unternehmenssoftware GmbH - Am Hofbräuhaus 1 - 96450
Coburg
+49 2642 40526292 +49 174 9747584 - skype:pirminb www.intars.de pb@intars.de
Geschäftsführer: Pirmin Braun, Ralf Engelhardt Registergericht: Amtsgericht
Coburg HRB3136
- Re: draft of a new Open Source Commercial License, (continued)
Re: draft of a new Open Source Commercial License, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller, 2013/09/18
Re: draft of a new Open Source Commercial License, David Chisnall, 2013/09/18
Re: draft of a new Open Source Commercial License, Liam Proven, 2013/09/19
Re: draft of a new Open Source Commercial License, David Chisnall, 2013/09/18
Re: draft of a new Open Source Commercial License, Liam Proven, 2013/09/19