dmca-activists
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[DMCA-Activists] MS Rivals to Lobby for GNU/Linux in Government


From: Seth Johnson
Subject: [DMCA-Activists] MS Rivals to Lobby for GNU/Linux in Government
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 00:37:22 -0400

> http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/microsoft/2001436280_linuxgroup08.html


Microsoft rivals plan pro-Linux lobbying 

By Bloomberg News
Friday, August 08, 2003


The Computer & Communications Industry Association, a trade group
representing Microsoft rivals, including Sun Microsystems and Oracle, plans
to form a lobby group to urge governments to use the Linux operating system. 

The association has spent the past few months developing the group, to be
called the Open Source and Industry Alliance, said spokesman Gregory
Minchak. The group would try to get U.S. federal and state governments and
other nations to consider using Linux and other so-called open-source
software. 

Open-source programs can be copied for free from the Internet, and modified
versions are sold by companies such as Red Hat, IBM and Sun. Linux for
running server computers is growing faster than Microsoft's rival Windows,
analysts say. Microsoft has lost some government orders to Linux. 

"We want consideration for Linux; we want a nice, level playing field,"
Minchak said. "The primary focus is not to go after Microsoft at all." He
declined to disclose members of the proposed lobbying group, which hasn't
been formed officially. 

Microsoft backs its own lobby, the Initiative for Software Choice, along
with Intel. 

That group was formed last year to oppose proposals under consideration in
more than 24 countries to require governments to use or consider using
open-source programs. 


-- 

DRM is Theft!  We are the Stakeholders!

New Yorkers for Fair Use
http://www.nyfairuse.org

[CC] Counter-copyright: http://www.boson2x.org/article.php3?id_article=21

I reserve no rights restricting copying, modification or distribution of
this incidentally recorded communication.  Original authorship should be
attributed reasonably, but only so far as such an expectation might hold for
usual practice in ordinary social discourse to which one holds no claim of
exclusive rights.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]