[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[DMCA-Activists] Oram, 1999: The Ghosts of Internet Time
From: |
Seth Johnson |
Subject: |
[DMCA-Activists] Oram, 1999: The Ghosts of Internet Time |
Date: |
Sun, 25 Dec 2005 00:05:41 -0500 |
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [Upd-discuss] The Ghosts of Internet Time
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 23:43:12 -0500 (EST)
From: Andy Oram <address@hidden>
To: address@hidden
(This first came out six years ago, but at this season I find it
relevant once again.)
http://www.praxagora.com/andyo/wr/ghost.html
The Ghosts of Internet Time
December 17, 1999
In the murky light of dawn I was bestirred by a sound I had
not heard for a long, long time. Groggily stumbling toward
the piercing beep, I exclaimed, "Why, it's the old Unix talk
program! That strange little full screen utility--discussed
by Douglas Hofstadter in Metamagical Themas--that prefigured
chat and instant messaging." In response to the letters
flashing on the green monitor, I quickly entered talk ghost
and pressed the RETURN key.
"This is the Ghost of Internet Past," wrote my mysterious
correspondent. "NSA, poppy, Castro. I shall show you the
Internet in its glorious early days. Tools were clunky back
then, but we all studied a bit and learned to understand the
medium we were using; and such a wonderful community we built
online!"
I remembered what the ghost was talking about. True, 99% of
all newsgroups degenerated into philosophical spats between
leftists and libertarians, and three-quarters of all the
alerts circulated had been hoaxes, but we still exploited the
incredible power of instant worldwide diffusion to carry out
some impressive campaigns. Lotus was a pretty big company
when an Internet protest made it withdraw its database
product on consumer spending.
"Look, Andy, you were more idealistic then too," admonished
the ghost. "It's been years since you contributed to free
software projects. Look at the dates on these files." A
stream of file names, dates, and sizes dribbled down my
scream.
I squinted at the vaguely familiar output format. "Yeah,
those dates are old. Where did you dig up that list?"
"Archie," typed the ghost.
"Oh, Ghost," I hammered out. "What has happened to the flame
of Internet community? Why do so few of the new users
understand it?"
"What do you expect once ANS took over the backbone?" spat
out the ghost. "Canter and Siegel, eye candy, streaming
media."
"But mere commercial usage isn't bad," I replied. "When
people trust a medium enough to put the very stuff of which
life is made there, it has come of age. Non-profit
organizations can be self-seeking information hoarders just
as much as for-profit organizations."
"Damned private-sector hegemonism--"
"Humbug. I've heard that all before; you're putting me to
sleep," I typed, and as if to lend credence to that statement
fell into unconsciousness once again.
Next I was awakened to a furious rush of talk. It was as if
someone had started several dozen RealPlayer streams at once.
The babble of many contributors crowded out all hope of
understanding. "Can anyone make sense of this!" I cried.
Coming to my rescue, a voice rose above the rest. "Welcome to
the debates over Internet policy. As the Ghost of Internet
Present, I have to follow them all."
"What on earth are they talking about?" I demanded.
"Do you mean: what do they claim to be talking about, or what
are they really talking about?"
"Both, I guess," I answered, non-plussed.
"Well," explained the ghost, "they think they are talking
about which of the old regulatory models to apply to a
revolutionary new space."
"Sounds pretty pointless."
"And that's why so few bother to listen. But really what
they're talking about is bandwidth."
"Yeah, I heard of that--won't dark fiber solve everything?"
"That's a 90s panacea," interrupted the ghost scornfully.
"The current fad is packet radio. But I was not talking about
physical bandwidth at all. I was referring to control. Who
has the power to use the Internet? Will it have job postings
for the underprivileged or only stock quotes for the
affluent? Can communities grow up spontaneously around great
works of creative art or must they pay a middleman? Should
taxpayer-funded research be sold for hundreds of dollars a
document or made freely available to all? Who can be reached
simply by requesting a name--big corporations or small
voices?"
"For goodness's sake," I exclaimed, "why don't people talk
about the issues that way!"
"A few try," replied the ghost, "but as soon as you start
looking closely at the legal, social, and implementation
implications, the answers get so--well, technical."
I wanted to ask more, but my ghost said, "The present is
fleeting. I must depart; the Ghost of Internet Future will be
here in my stead."
Excitement seized me. "Oh Ghost of Internet Future," I cried,
"show me what glories the medium has still to offer!"
Someone grasped my arm and dragged me running through mazes
of clattering streets under gray skies, where no creature
tread and no breeze stirred. "Where is the Internet Future?"
I yelled. "Where did everybody go?"
"The Internet is gone," said my companion, stooped and hoary.
"How could that be--what could replace its bounty?"
"The international financial institutions have a proprietary
satellite-based network, imposing and impenetrable. The
entertainment companies put out 6500 programs a week, all
strictly metered by kilobyte and filtered to isolate
controversial content. The electric companies--which always
controlled the ultimate pipe, and therefore ended up
controlling the medium--run the network that activates
devices in the home. Everything the vendors want is built
into powerful circuits costing a thousandth of a penny,
making software and the culture that accompanied it obsolete.
So there are many separate networks, each specialized and
tightly controlled."
"But what about democracy? What about a public space? Is
there no forum for the average citizen?"
The old Ghost's wrinkled face cracked in a sputtering, hollow
laugh. "Forum? You want a forum? I'll give you a million of
'em. Every time Consolidated Services, Inc. or Skanditek puts
up a new item on their media outlets, they leave a space for
viewers to post reactions. And they post, and post, and post.
Nobody can track the debates..."
"They forgot," I sighed. "People forgot that the Internet
enables discussion and community; they acquiesced to an
overly pragmatic and impersonal approach that fragmented
protocols and media in such a way as to remove the human
element. What can I do to prevent this, Ghost? Tell me what
to do when I return to my present life!"
But mists swept over the scene and the hand of the Ghost of
the Internet Future slipped invisibly from mine. "I am
fading," it whispered. "The Internet is gone..."
And so I awoke, but I lay with eyes closed and addressed my
three Ghosts in my thoughts: "I promise I will learn the
lessons you taught tonight!
"Ghost of Internet Past, I promise I will learn about the
technologies that affect my life so that I can control them.
"Ghost of Internet Present, I will talk to ordinary people
about the everyday issues that are affected by Internet
politics. And I'll use it to fight real problems: racism, the
income gap, war, ecological devastation.
"Finally, Ghost of Internet Future, I will always insist that
the Internet is more than a means of transmitting data--it is
a place for building community."
And the day was still just dawning.
_____________________________________________________________
Andy Oram is an editor at O'Reilly Media and a member of
Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility. This
article represents his views only. It was originally
published in the online magazine Web Review.
_______________________________________________
Upd-discuss mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.essential.org/mailman/listinfo/upd-discuss
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [DMCA-Activists] Oram, 1999: The Ghosts of Internet Time,
Seth Johnson <=