Re: [dmidecode] dmidecode 2.8 to be released soon

[Petter Reinholdtsen]

[Jean Delvare]
> Hi Petter,

Hi. :)

> I had a similar report yesterday just after sending this message to
> the list. I came to the same conclusions, and actually CVS is
> supposedly already fixed.

Great. :)

> However, I only included <sys/types.h>. Including <unistd.h> alone
> did not seem to help the reporter, while <sys/types.h> alone
> did. Did you need both? Or is including both the standard way to
> make sure off_t will be defined on every system out there? If so
> I'll add <unistd.h> too.

The CVS version work just fine.  I listed both headers based on the
content of 'man lseek', and did not check if only one was enough.
Using only <sys/types.h> solve the problem for me. :)

The new version seem to do its job for my IBM thinkpad.  I tested both
dmidecode and vpddecode. :)