Le 07/08/12 13:27, Marc-Henri Pamiseux
a écrit :
I totally agree with this idea.
It is the author of a program or module that decides if his work should
be distributed under a free license.
The people fixing bugs are also authors but they have to approve and
respect the original license.
Do we need to distinguish these two categories as author ?
In the same idea, I have an old troll who remains ...
Why do we use "github" to manage the sources of a free project ?
and, why not ? ;-)
Oops ...
Sorry, we are only Tuesday ;)
Best regards,
Le 07/08/2012 09:52, Régis Houssin a écrit :
I'm not willing to put the association as a signature on the new files,
I would prefer that everyone put his name,
after all, it is the person who develops and not the association :-)
_______________________________________________
Dolibarr-dev mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dolibarr-dev
Cordialement,
--
Régis Houssin
---------------------------------------------------------
Cap-Networks
Cidex 1130
34, route de Gigny
71240 MARNAY
FRANCE
VoIP: +33 1 83 62 40 03
GSM: +33 6 33 02 07 97
Web: http://www.cap-networks.com/
Email: address@hidden
Dolibarr developer: address@hidden
Web Portal: http://www.dolibarr.fr/
SaaS offers: http://www.dolibox.fr/
Shop: http://www.dolistore.com/
Development platform: https://doliforge.org/
---------------------------------------------------------