[DotGNU]RE: Developers digest, Vol 1 #170 - 10 msgs

[Gary L. Sun]

Yes, UDDI/WSDL needs to be part of DotGNU
service mechanism. Take a look at systinet.com.

I believe the charter on DotGNU's page says
competing  by inventing. Changing gears now ?

Personally, I think we should use as many open
standards as possible, gather as many as dev
communities as possible. But why other will join
us ? What is goog about DotGNU ? Why is it
better to join DotGNU ? Will DotGNU make developer
richer than M$ ? (we need to eat after all.) Will
DotGNU create better and produce better products?
security ? web services ? privacy protection ?
access control ? better network service load balancing
? redefined distributed computing ? better
management ? most of all, better an more freedom ?

The core and steering guys need to have all of these
answered, I think, and I hope.

Gary


Message: 10
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 10:49:19 +0200
From: Norbert Bollow <address@hidden>
To: address@hidden
CC: address@hidden
Subject: [DotGNU]UDDI/WDSL (was Re: WOS)

> > > I've been reading about UDDI (www.uddi.org),
> >
> > Hm... it says on their website "UDDI is currently being guided
> > by a group of industry leaders that are spearheading the early
> > creation and design efforts."  Given that Microsoft is one of
> > those "industry leaders" that are "guiding" UDDI, what makes you
> > think that UDDI would play fair with us?
>
> There are implementations of UDDI, one is jUDDI (www.juddi.org). Probably
> there are more, but I haven't looked. Personally I can't see why this
> specification wouldn't stay open. It's possible that MS uses UDDI for
.Net,
> but I don't think MS will try anything with UDDI. The standard
> is too big and important for that. There are over 200
> companies in the UDDI community. But of course, those are just
> my personal believes...

Ok... jUDDI has a BSD-style license, which is GPL-compatible.
So in a worst-case scenario, it would be resonably easy for
DotGNU to fork jUDDI.  Therefore I think you're right, there
seems to be no reason why DotGNU couldn't endorse UDDI.

> http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl
> [..]
> UDDI/WDSL is a lookup service, like Jini. Businesses and services
registers
> themselves and then you can search for the service you want and use it,
like
> the Yellow Pages I guess. This just solves a fraction of what DotGNU, but
I
> thought it looked nice. Are there any other plans for lookup services?

I believe Gary and Barry have been talking about some
ideas... but why should we do our own thing when it's so much
easier to use something that exists already?

Greetings, Norbert.

--
A member of FreeDevelopers and the DotGNU Steering Committee: dotgnu.org
Norbert Bollow, Weidlistr.18, CH-8624 Gruet   (near Zurich, Switzerland)
Tel +41 1 972 20 59       Fax +41 1 972 20 69      http://thinkcoach.com
Your own domain with all your Mailman lists: $15/month  http://cisto.com