[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]Bugs to the list
From: |
Rhys Weatherley |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]Bugs to the list |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Mar 2003 20:55:18 +1000 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.4.3 |
On Wednesday 12 March 2003 08:34 pm, Norbert Bollow wrote:
> I think mdupont makes an important point... this should be a separate
> list.
The problem with that is it sort of gets us back to the original problem: very
few people see the bugs because they don't know where to look, and so the
level of help drops off. I was hoping for a more "in our faces" approach.
Could we trial sending the bugs to "address@hidden" for a few weeks,
and then split it off if people start to complain? Perhaps even create a
"address@hidden" for general pnet discussion and bugs if it seems
worthwhile.
Anyway, I'm easy - either way will work for me since I get the bugs mailed to
me regardless. It's really up to the rest of the community.
Cheers,
Rhys.
- [DotGNU]Bugs to the list, Rhys Weatherley, 2003/03/12
- Re: [DotGNU]Bugs to the list, Mike Peters, 2003/03/12
- Re: [DotGNU]Bugs to the list, James Michael DuPont, 2003/03/12
- Re: [DotGNU]Bugs to the list, Norbert Bollow, 2003/03/12
- Re: [DotGNU]Bugs to the list, Norbert Bollow, 2003/03/12
- Re: [DotGNU]Bugs to the list, Peter Minten, 2003/03/12
- Re: [DotGNU]Bugs to the list, Ian Game, 2003/03/28
- Re: [DotGNU]Bugs to the list, Gopal V, 2003/03/28
- [DotGNU]netbsd package, pancake, 2003/03/28
- Re: [DotGNU]Bugs to the list, Stephen Compall, 2003/03/15
Re: [DotGNU]Bugs to the list, Gopal V, 2003/03/12