[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]Errno_map.c
From: |
Marcus |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]Errno_map.c |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Sep 2004 20:48:25 -0500 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.7 |
I don't know how to determine which is the "real" errno.h. I see many files on
my system with the name errno.h and several others with variations on that
name.
For example, ENOENT is defined in /usr/include/asm-generic/errno-base.h, but
ENOSYS is defined in /usr/include/asm-generic/errno.h.
This is very frustrating.
On Thursday 23 September 2004 7:45 pm, Rhys Weatherley wrote:
> On Friday 24 September 2004 10:30 am, Marcus wrote:
> > Has someone been hacking on whatever script generates errno_map.c? I'm
> > asking because the file defines errno_map.c twice, and the definition
> > that gets picked up looks like this:
>
> This can happen if the gen_errno.sh script fails to locate the real version
> of errno.h for some reason (it could be <errno.h>, <sys/errno.h>,
> <asm/errno.h> or basically anything). Or the lines in the file do not
> match the pattern it is looking for. You'll need to look at the first part
> of "gen_errno.sh" to try to figure out why it fails. It works fine here.