Re: [Dotgnu-libs-devel] Re: DotGNU Libraries (dotgnu-libs) on Savannah

[Andrew Mitchell]

I'd go for DotGNU.Xyz then, since it's how the rest of the namespaces are.


On Fri, Jul 26, 2002 at 01:39:00PM +0200, Peter Minten wrote:
> Gopal V wrote:
> > 
> > If memory serves me right, Peter Minten wrote:
> > > Customary in C# is for us what pnetlib and DG-Base do, both use 
> > > capitalised
> > > namespaces (System, Platform, DotGNU).
> > 
> > Well so I think the "Capitalization" should remain in DG-Base ... I intend
> > to follow dotgnu.xml for the libxml2 wrappers ...
> > 
> > > I suggest the way DG-Base handles things: DotGNU.Xxx* for the namespace,
> > > dotgnu.xxxxx.dll for the file. We could of course use Dotgnu.Xxx if the
> > > DotGNU.Xxx is too much working with the shift key :-).
> > 
> > We were talking about "DotGNU vs dotgnu" for dotgnu-libs in general ...
> > not DG-Base .. (in particular)
> 
> I was talking about dotgnu-libs as a whole too, don't forget DG-Base is part 
> of
> DG-Libs so if dg-libs changes namespaces capitalization it would be weird to
> have DG-Base with other capitalization (just think of the aestatical disaster 
> if
> you would have dotgnu.xml and DotGNU.Net beside eachother :-). A quote from
> ajmitch e-mail which started this thread: 
> 
> > It will not be good to
> > have some modules as dotgnu.rpc, for example, while others are DotGNU.IO
> 
> Of course if we could modify cscc to have an 'case insensitive in namespaces'
> option the problem would also be solved :-). 
> 
> I don't have the feeling one side on this discussion is going to pull the 
> others
> over so let's have a voting of all the developers. I vote for DotGNU.Xxx for 
> all
> of dg-libs.
> 
> Greetings,
> 
> Peter
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Dotgnu-libs-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dotgnu-libs-devel
> 
> 

-- 
Andrew Mitchell
Email: address@hidden