Re: [Duplicity-talk] list-current-files fails without specifying --archive-dir

[Kenneth Loafman]

Gabriel Ambuehl wrote:
> On Sunday 25 November 2007 14:21:06 Kenneth Loafman wrote:
>> Thanks!  Been chasing it here.  It appears that duplicity is writing
>> full-sigs only to the remote, not the archive dir, but is writing
>> new-sigs to both.  The code should write both to both.  Will chase it.
>> This may help clear up a lot of confusion with archive dir.
> 
> Actually, it seems like it does not write full sigs to the REMOTE.
> 
> Witness, on the remote, 
> ls  *sig*
> duplicity-new-signatures.2007-11-13T12:37:14+02:00.to.2007-11-13T20:55:07+02:00.sigtar.gpg
> duplicity-new-signatures.2007-11-13T20:55:07+02:00.to.2007-11-14T15:13:55+02:00.sigtar.gpg
> duplicity-new-signatures.2007-11-14T15:13:55+02:00.to.2007-11-14T16:47:09+02:00.sigtar.gpg
> duplicity-new-signatures.2007-11-14T16:47:09+02:00.to.2007-11-15T10:56:01+02:00.sigtar.gpg
> duplicity-new-signatures.2007-11-15T10:56:01+02:00.to.2007-11-16T08:36:18+02:00.sigtar.gpg
> duplicity-new-signatures.2007-11-16T08:36:18+02:00.to.2007-11-16T11:20:02+02:00.sigtar.gpg
> duplicity-new-signatures.2007-11-16T11:20:02+02:00.to.2007-11-16T20:09:14+02:00.sigtar.gpg
> duplicity-new-signatures.2007-11-16T20:09:14+02:00.to.2007-11-20T10:33:26+02:00.sigtar.gpg
> duplicity-new-signatures.2007-11-20T10:33:26+02:00.to.2007-11-21T09:27:53+02:00.sigtar.gpg
> duplicity-new-signatures.2007-11-21T09:27:53+02:00.to.2007-11-21T14:17:43+02:00.sigtar.gpg
> 
> 
> That may be the reason for the orphaned sigs, too?

Sorry, I said it backwards, and even then was wrong!  It writes full
sigs to the archdir and the remote, then turns around and deletes the
full sigs it just wrote on the remote.  AArgh!

...Ken

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature