[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Duplicity-talk] are periodic full backups necessary?
From: |
Peter Schuller |
Subject: |
Re: [Duplicity-talk] are periodic full backups necessary? |
Date: |
Sun, 20 Jan 2008 08:03:36 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.7 |
Actually, one possibility if one is very much looking for this combination of
features might be:
http://www.boxbackup.org/
I was going to try it once but dropped it as I found the initial setup more
complex than I wanted a backup tool to be. However, I like the fundamental
principle of its operation.
But you may want to read:
http://www.daemonology.net/blog/2006-09-14-more-about-backup.html
and
http://www.daemonology.net/blog/2007-01-12-box-backup.html
--
/ Peter Schuller
PGP userID: 0xE9758B7D or 'Peter Schuller <address@hidden>'
Key retrieval: Send an E-Mail to address@hidden
E-Mail: address@hidden Web: http://www.scode.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [Duplicity-talk] are periodic full backups necessary?,
Peter Schuller <=
Re: [Duplicity-talk] are periodic full backups necessary?, Gabriel Ambuehl, 2008/01/20
Re: [Duplicity-talk] are periodic full backups necessary?, Kenneth Loafman, 2008/01/20