Re: [Duplicity-talk] CIFS support?

[Jacob]

On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 10:50:19 -0500
Kenneth Loafman <address@hidden> wrote:

> In the long run I would rather us work with the Samba folks to make
> their product better than go off and do an end run that is not likely to
> bear much success if the underlying foundation is not all that strong.

I couldn't agree more. I think, really, Samba needs to be fixed, not duplicity.

The best option here may be a duplicity+rsync combination as a workaround in 
the meantime.