[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Log patch
From: |
Michael Terry |
Subject: |
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Log patch |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:00:25 -0500 |
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Kenneth Loafman <address@hidden> wrote:
\>> I chose this route over the dbus route since it seemed to be the least
>> invasive and least controversial. The jury is still out on dbus and I
>> don't want to revive that issue at the moment. I hope this is what you
>> need for your project.
Yeah, this is fine. I'm happy with any old thing. DBus was just my
go-to fix. I've already committed code to deja-dup that uses the
error reporting. Thanks!
> Whoops, I should have tested before shoving this to CVS. log.py does
> not work under Python 2.3 or 2.4 and we have a fair number of folks on
> RHEL 4 that use duplicity under Python 2.3.
>
> I think we should try to make it backwards compatible if at all
> possible. Do you have access to Python 2.3 or 2.4 for testing? If not,
> we would need to make it a NOOP for Python versions less than 2.5.
Oy, I tried to be compatible (according to docs). I even went through
some hoops to not use 2.5 features. But I didn't actually test
against 2.3. I'll get 2.3 and try to fix.
-mt
- [Duplicity-talk] Log patch, Michael Terry, 2008/11/09
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Log patch, edgar . soldin, 2008/11/10
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Log patch, Peter Schuller, 2008/11/10
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Log patch, Michael Terry, 2008/11/10
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Log patch, Michael Terry, 2008/11/10
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Log patch, Kenneth Loafman, 2008/11/12
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Log patch, Kenneth Loafman, 2008/11/12
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Log patch,
Michael Terry <=
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Log patch, Kenneth Loafman, 2008/11/12
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Log patch, Michael Terry, 2008/11/12