duplicity-talk
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Duplicity-talk] Volsize


From: Peter Schuller
Subject: Re: [Duplicity-talk] Volsize
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 14:14:12 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

> Are there particular pros/cons with using a small or large volsize?
> With mixing small and large volsizes?
> 
> My guess is that bigger volsize reduces metadata overhead and/or it
> makes each volume zip smaller.  The downside is that you use more
> tempspace?

(*) You do use more tempspace.  

(*) Re-tries happen at the full volume level, so if uploads/downloads
are unreliable, large volume sizes may be difficult (if a single
transfer never is able to finish).

(*) On the other hand, larger volume sizes may be faster to
upload/download, allowing TCP to reach full speed. For example with S3
I have observed a relatively slow ramp-up, so a larger volume size
means a higher average speed.

(*) Ditto when the per-file overhead is large, such as with sftp.

-- 
/ Peter Schuller

PGP userID: 0xE9758B7D or 'Peter Schuller <address@hidden>'
Key retrieval: Send an E-Mail to address@hidden
E-Mail: address@hidden Web: http://www.scode.org

Attachment: pgpQuI4K9JFee.pgp
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]