[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Duplicity-talk] some usage questions regarding full/incremental bac
|
From: |
Peter Schuller |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Duplicity-talk] some usage questions regarding full/incremental backups |
|
Date: |
Sat, 3 Jan 2009 14:20:38 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
> At least, that is how I understand it. It is a trade-off between
> rsync and encryption ...
Encryption makes it difficult; what also makes it more difficult is
that duplicity is designed to backup to "dumb storage" and cannot
assume a duplicity on the other end of the pipe doing fancy
calculations on local data (as is the case with rdiff-backup).
--
/ Peter Schuller
PGP userID: 0xE9758B7D or 'Peter Schuller <address@hidden>'
Key retrieval: Send an E-Mail to address@hidden
E-Mail: address@hidden Web: http://www.scode.org
pgprRN4UOPVd7.pgp
Description: PGP signature