[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: [Deja-dup-hackers] hard links
From: |
Kenneth Loafman |
Subject: |
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: [Deja-dup-hackers] hard links |
Date: |
Sat, 02 May 2009 11:27:37 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090318) |
Michael Terry wrote:
> 2009/4/28 Todd Ross <address@hidden>:
>> In your 9.0 Plans post, you indicate that you work on / contribute to
>> the duplicity project. Do you have any insight into why duplicity can't
>> handle hard links? Is it a limitation of one of the underlying tools?
>> rdiff? rdiffdir? tar? Is it a portability problem?
>
> I believe it's a limitation of tar. I'm also attaching the duplicity
> discussion list, they may have more specific insights.
No, not a tarfile limitation, there are hard links in the tarfile test
code. The exception in duplicity is "Hard links not supported yet" if
you try to back up a hard link, kind of implying work to be done.
I'll have to study up on how hard links are handled before commenting
further. As I recall, there's some really odd logic in handling files
with multiple hard links coming to them.
...Thanks,
...Ken
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature