duplicity-talk
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Duplicity-talk] Google Drive vs. Google Cloud Storage


From: Chris Vanden Berghe
Subject: Re: [Duplicity-talk] Google Drive vs. Google Cloud Storage
Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2014 12:11:25 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0

Hi Edgar,

Unfortunately I do not seem to be able to reproduce the issue anymore.

Found 1 secondary backup chain.
Secondary chain 1 of 1:
-------------------------
Chain start time: Sat May  3 03:30:22 2014
Chain end time: Mon Jun  2 03:30:22 2014
Number of contained backup sets: 30
Total number of contained volumes: 8819
 Type of backup set:                            Time:      Num volumes:
                Full         Sat May  3 03:30:22 2014              8199
         Incremental         Mon May  5 03:30:21 2014                94
         Incremental         Tue May  6 03:30:24 2014                 5
         Incremental         Wed May  7 03:30:22 2014                 3
         Incremental         Thu May  8 03:30:23 2014                 4
         Incremental         Fri May  9 03:30:23 2014                 4
         Incremental         Sat May 10 03:30:22 2014                 4
         Incremental         Sun May 11 03:30:23 2014                 7
         Incremental         Mon May 12 03:30:24 2014               112
         Incremental         Tue May 13 03:30:22 2014                12
         Incremental         Wed May 14 03:30:24 2014                58
         Incremental         Thu May 15 03:30:23 2014                 6
         Incremental         Fri May 16 03:30:22 2014                 4
         Incremental         Sat May 17 03:30:23 2014                 5
         Incremental         Sun May 18 03:30:24 2014                 5
         Incremental         Mon May 19 03:30:22 2014                13
         Incremental         Tue May 20 03:30:23 2014                 5
         Incremental         Wed May 21 03:30:24 2014                49
         Incremental         Thu May 22 03:30:23 2014                38
         Incremental         Fri May 23 03:30:22 2014                 5
         Incremental         Sat May 24 03:30:22 2014                 4
         Incremental         Sun May 25 03:30:22 2014                 5
         Incremental         Mon May 26 03:30:24 2014                82
         Incremental         Tue May 27 03:30:22 2014                25
         Incremental         Wed May 28 03:30:23 2014                 5
         Incremental         Thu May 29 03:30:22 2014                 5
         Incremental         Fri May 30 03:30:25 2014                42
         Incremental         Sat May 31 03:30:22 2014                 4
         Incremental         Sun Jun  1 03:30:24 2014                 4
         Incremental         Mon Jun  2 03:30:22 2014                11
-------------------------


Found primary backup chain with matching signature chain:
-------------------------
Chain start time: Tue Jun  3 03:30:25 2014
Chain end time: Sat Jun  7 03:30:22 2014
Number of contained backup sets: 4
Total number of contained volumes: 8414
 Type of backup set:                            Time:      Num volumes:
                Full         Tue Jun  3 03:30:25 2014              8316
         Incremental         Thu Jun  5 03:30:21 2014                56
         Incremental         Fri Jun  6 03:30:23 2014                27
         Incremental         Sat Jun  7 03:30:22 2014                15
-------------------------
No orphaned or incomplete backup sets found.


The first incremental backup is still larger but that can probably be
explained by the time it takes for the full backup to complete.

Regards,
Chris.

---
On 17/05/2014 17:54, address@hidden wrote:
> can you confirm that your logs show the symptoms described by the bug thread 
> starter?
>
> ..ede
>
> On 17.05.2014 09:01, Chris Vanden Berghe wrote:
>> Thank you for the pointer; I have subscribed to the bug report. I'm
>> happy to help test if that would help.
>>
>> Chris.
>>
>> ---
>> On 16/05/2014 10:06, address@hidden wrote:
>>> On 16.05.2014 04:23, Chris Vanden Berghe wrote:
>>>> Just some feedback in case other people want to try Google Cloud
>>>> Storage. I have been using Duplicity with GCS for 1,5 months now and so
>>>> far so good. It's cheap at ~$4 / month for 200GB+ (inbound traffic is
>>>> free, very little outbound traffic used). I has been perfectly stable.
>>>> It's a bit on the slow side with a 200GB initial backup taking just over
>>>> 24h to complete. I have sufficient bandwidth, so not entirely sure what
>>>> the bottleneck is... CPU, throttling by Google or the Duplicity backend
>>>> implementation. I have not tried Google Drive yet so cannot compare both
>>>> services.
>>>>
>>>> Quick question: the first incremental backup after an initial full
>>>> backup is always very large. What would be the reason for that? Is there
>>>> an easy way to find out which files changed?
>>>>
>>> check your logs.. you might suffer from the same issue as
>>>  https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/248111
>>>
>>> ..ede/duply.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
> _______________________________________________
> Duplicity-talk mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]