[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[emacs-bidi] Re: Is emacs-bidi merged int o unicode-2 ?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
[emacs-bidi] Re: Is emacs-bidi merged int o unicode-2 ? |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Nov 2005 21:35:36 +0200 |
> From: "Yotam Medini" <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 10:36:02 +0200
>
> > From: Eli Zaretskii
> > Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 06:32:01 +0200
> >
> > ...
> >
> > The branch name is emacs-bidi. The instructions to use the Emacs CVS
> > can be found here:
> >
> > http://savannah.gnu.org/cvs/?group=emacs
>
> Looks like this branch is inactive for about two years.
> Isn't it merged into the 'unicode-2' branch ?
No, it isn't, for the obvious reason that the emacs-bidi branch is
extremely unstable, so it would screw up the unicode-2 branch which is
used by several people who actively work on the Unicode version of
Emacs. Unfortunately, there's no similar enthusiasm for making the
emacs-bidi branch stable; if this goes on, we will never have a
bidi-enabled Emacs.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [emacs-bidi] Re: Is emacs-bidi merged int o unicode-2 ?,
Eli Zaretskii <=