emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Emacs-bug-tracker] bug#5529: marked as done (`uniquify-buffer-name-styl


From: Emacs bug Tracking System
Subject: [Emacs-bug-tracker] bug#5529: marked as done (`uniquify-buffer-name-style' doesn't exist)
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 07:24:02 +0000

Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2010 02:23:01 -0500
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#5529: `uniquify-buffer-name-style' doesn't exist
has caused the Emacs bug report #5529,
regarding `uniquify-buffer-name-style' doesn't exist
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact address@hidden
immediately.)


-- 
5529: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=5529
Emacs Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: `uniquify-buffer-name-style' doesn't exist Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 15:18:59 +0000 User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Hi, Emacs!

On the Emacs manual page "Uniquify" ("Making Buffer Names Unique"), it
says you can change the style of buffer names like foo.c<2> by
customising the variable `uniquify-buffer-name-style'.

This variable doesn't exist.  It didn't exist in Emacs 22 or Emacs 21
either.

My feeling is that it is the code rather than the manual which is at
fault.  :-)

-- 
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#5529: `uniquify-buffer-name-style' doesn't exist Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 02:23:01 -0500 User-agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/)
I've mentioned in the manual that uniquify must be loaded explicitly.
This obviously isn't ideal but there is already a separate bug to
improve this specific issue; and the more general issue has also been
discussed elsewhere.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]