emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Emacs-bug-tracker] bug#5914: marked as done (feature request and non-bu


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [Emacs-bug-tracker] bug#5914: marked as done (feature request and non-bug patches submit policy)
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 22:49:02 +0000

Your message dated Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:48:49 -0600
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#5914: feature request and non-bug patches submit policy
has caused the GNU bug report #5914,
regarding feature request and non-bug patches submit policy
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact address@hidden
immediately.)


-- 
5914: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=5914
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: feature request and non-bug patches submit policy Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 17:28:25 +0800 User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080505)
Hi Jim,

I'd like to know if I should still submit new feature patches to here or 
address@hidden

A few months ago, I found the heads up for the new address@hidden mail list, 
and it mentioned
only the bugs report/fix should be send to this list.  Otherwise, for the 
general discussion and new
features request should go to the new list, Am I right?

But looks there is little activity in address@hidden, I have sent a few patches 
related to cp(1)
sparse file enhancement through fiemap ioctl(2), but almostly no response from 
the list members in
about 2 weeks, except Joel I cc-ed.  Maybe nobody is interesed. :(

I know you guys are busy with work.  Actually, I just want to know if I was 
misunderstood the
policy?  If so, I will submit the patches here.

Sorry for the inconvience!



Best regards,
-Jeff




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#5914: feature request and non-bug patches submit policy Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:48:49 -0600 User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
jeff.liu wrote:
> I'd like to know if I should still submit new feature patches to
> here or address@hidden

I think the original issue has been fully dealt with so I am going to
close the issue in the bts.  If you think otherwise please feel free
to follow up with more information.

This thread has gone through a little mutation during the discussion.
I think the subsequent discussion around fiemap may still have some
life in it but I think it has also mostly been resolved by discussion
on the coreutils mailing list.  In any case it probably shouldn't be
here going forward.  If that needs to continue then we should clone
the issue and retitle it to track that development.  When possible it
is best to keep issues one per ticket.  But since I think it has
concluded here too I am just going to close it with the original.

Bob


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]