[Emacs-bug-tracker] bug#6537: closed (23.2; doc fix for rx)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 29 Jun 2010 14:12:22 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#6537: 23.2; doc fix for rx
has caused the GNU bug report #6537,
regarding 23.2; doc fix for rx
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
6537: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=6537
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> 23.2; doc fix for rx
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Tue, 29 Jun 2010 12:35:23 +0100
>
>
>
>
> It seems like leftover since it is already mentioned in the preceding
> text.
>
> Changes in HEAD
>         Modified lisp/emacs-lisp/rx.el
> diff --git a/lisp/emacs-lisp/rx.el b/lisp/emacs-lisp/rx.el
> index 5d04494..85fe351 100644
> --- a/lisp/emacs-lisp/rx.el
> +++ b/lisp/emacs-lisp/rx.el
> @@ -1053,9 +1053,6 @@ CHAR
>       like `and', but makes the match accessible with `match-end',
>       `match-beginning', and `match-string'.
>  
> -`(group SEXP1 SEXP2 ...)'
> -     another name for `submatch'.
> -
>  `(or SEXP1 SEXP2 ...)'
>  `(| SEXP1 SEXP2 ...)'
>       matches anything that matches SEXP1 or SEXP2, etc.  If all
>
>
> Leo
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#6537: 23.2; doc fix for rx
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Tue, 29 Jun 2010 14:12:22 +0200
>
>
>
>
> > It seems like leftover since it is already mentioned in the preceding
> > text.
>
> Committed, thanks.
>
> BTW, you have now a fair number of "tiny patches". Perhaps you could
> sign papers in order to be able to do any more contributions?
>
>     Juanma
>
>
> --- End Message ---