[Emacs-bug-tracker] bug#6708: closed (nxml-mode needs updating in respect to Unicode support)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 23 Jul 2010 11:49:32 -0400
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#6708: nxml-mode needs updating in respect to Unicode 
support
has caused the GNU bug report #6708,
regarding nxml-mode needs updating in respect to Unicode support
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
6708: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=6708
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> nxml-mode needs updating in respect to Unicode support
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Thu, 22 Jul 2010 20:06:27 +0100
>
>
>
>
> In the section "Limitations", the nxml-mode manual says:
>
>    * Unicode support has problems. This stems mostly from the fact that
>      the XML (and RELAX NG) character model is based squarely on
>      Unicode, whereas the Emacs character model is not.  Emacs 22 is
>      slated to have full Unicode support, which should improve the
>      situation here.
>
> Since we are now well past Emacs 22, and a lot of work has been done
> on Unicode support, presumably a) the situation has improved and b)
> someone has some idea in what way it has improved, so this paragraph
> could be updated?
>
> -- 
> http://rrt.sc3d.org
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#6708: nxml-mode needs updating in respect to Unicode support
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Fri, 23 Jul 2010 11:49:32 -0400
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> Reuben Thomas <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > In the section "Limitations", the nxml-mode manual says:
> >
> >    * Unicode support has problems. This stems mostly from the fact that
> >      the XML (and RELAX NG) character model is based squarely on
> >      Unicode, whereas the Emacs character model is not.  Emacs 22 is
> >      slated to have full Unicode support, which should improve the
> >      situation here.
> >
> > Since we are now well past Emacs 22, and a lot of work has been done
> > on Unicode support, presumably a) the situation has improved and b)
> > someone has some idea in what way it has improved, so this paragraph
> > could be updated?
>
> Thanks, I simply removed the paragraph.
>
>
> --- End Message ---