[Emacs-bug-tracker] bug#7654: closed (docs: is LTLIBRARIES missing from the list of primaries in the automake manual?)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:54:21 +0100
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#7654: docs: is LTLIBRARIES missing from the list of 
primaries in the automake manual?
has caused the GNU bug report #7654,
regarding docs: is LTLIBRARIES missing from the list of primaries in the 
automake manual?
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
7654: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=7654
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> docs: is LTLIBRARIES missing from the list of primaries in the	automake manual?
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:40:37 +0100
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.30-2-686; KDE/4.4.4; i686; ; )
>
>
>
>
> The subjects says it all, basically.
>
> In section "3.3 The Uniform Naming Scheme" I read:
>
>  ``The current primary names are ‘PROGRAMS’, ‘LIBRARIES’, ‘LISP’,
>    ‘PYTHON’, ‘JAVA’, ‘SCRIPTS’, ‘DATA’, ‘HEADERS’, ‘MANS’, and
>    ‘TEXINFOS’. Some primaries also allow additional prefixes that
>    control other aspects of automake's behavior. ...''
>
> Shouldn't `LTLIBRARIES' be listed here too?  Or am I missing
> something?
>
> Regards,
>   Stefano
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#7654: docs: is LTLIBRARIES missing from the list of primaries	in the automake manual?
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:54:21 +0100
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.30-2-686; KDE/4.4.4; i686; ; )
>
>
>
>
> On Thursday 16 December 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 06:40:37PM CET:
> > > In section "3.3 The Uniform Naming Scheme" I read:
> > > 
> > >  ``The current primary names are ‘PROGRAMS’, ‘LIBRARIES’, ‘LISP’,
> > >    ‘PYTHON’, ‘JAVA’, ‘SCRIPTS’, ‘DATA’, ‘HEADERS’, ‘MANS’, and
> > >    ‘TEXINFOS’. Some primaries also allow additional prefixes that
> > >    control other aspects of automake's behavior. ...''
> > > 
> > > Shouldn't `LTLIBRARIES' be listed here too?
> > 
> > Yes.  The obvious patch is preapproved.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Ralf
> > 
>
> This is what I pushed to maint.
>
> Regards,
>    Stefano
>
> -*-*-*-
>
> docs: list LTLIBRARIES among Automake primaries
>
> * doc/automake.texi (Uniform): List `LTLIBRARIES' among
> the Automake primaries.
> ---
>  ChangeLog         |    6 ++++++
>  doc/automake.texi |    6 ++++--
>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
> index 2482ef1..3eee3a7 100644
> --- a/ChangeLog
> +++ b/ChangeLog
> @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
> +2010-12-16  Stefano Lattarini  <address@hidden>
> +
> +       docs: list LTLIBRARIES among Automake primaries
> +       * doc/automake.texi (Uniform): List `LTLIBRARIES' among
> +       the Automake primaries.
> +
>  2010-12-14  Stefano Lattarini  <address@hidden>
>  
>         Improve tests on generated portions of configure help screen.
> diff --git a/doc/automake.texi b/doc/automake.texi
> index 5a805b3..227b1ba 100644
> --- a/doc/automake.texi
> +++ b/doc/automake.texi
> @@ -2024,10 +2024,12 @@ should not be built until the @samp{make check} command 
> is run.  Those
>  objects are not installed either.
>  
>  The current primary names are @samp{PROGRAMS}, @samp{LIBRARIES},
> address@hidden, @samp{PYTHON}, @samp{JAVA}, @samp{SCRIPTS}, @samp{DATA},
> address@hidden, @samp{MANS}, and @samp{TEXINFOS}.
> address@hidden, @samp{LISP}, @samp{PYTHON}, @samp{JAVA},
> address@hidden, @samp{DATA}, @samp{HEADERS}, @samp{MANS}, and
> address@hidden
>  @vindex PROGRAMS
>  @vindex LIBRARIES
> address@hidden LTLIBRARIES
>  @vindex LISP
>  @vindex PYTHON
>  @vindex JAVA
> -- 
> 1.7.1
>
>
> --- End Message ---