[Emacs-bug-tracker] bug#7704: closed ([PATCH] tests: mv/i-3: avoid false-positive failure on a slow/busy system)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 22 Dec 2010 12:04:22 +0100
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#7704: [PATCH] tests: mv/i-3: avoid false-positive 
failure on a slow/busy system
has caused the GNU bug report #7704,
regarding [PATCH] tests: mv/i-3: avoid false-positive failure on a slow/busy 
system
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
7704: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=7704
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> [PATCH] tests: mv/i-3: avoid false-positive failure on a slow/busy	system
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Wed, 22 Dec 2010 10:31:17 +0100
>
>
>
>
> FYI,
>
> >From a300cfd43ccb3f48f5110a2abf6fe234fece3dc3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jim Meyering <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 10:29:30 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] tests: mv/i-3: avoid false-positive failure on a slow/busy 
> system
>
> * tests/mv/i-3: Quadruple the timeout duration.
> Without this, I saw an expired timeout on a heavily-loaded system.
> ---
>  tests/mv/i-3 |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/mv/i-3 b/tests/mv/i-3
> index 983aad9..7b77273 100755
> --- a/tests/mv/i-3
> +++ b/tests/mv/i-3
> @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ check_overwrite_prompt()
>      *) sleep $delay; return 1;;
>    esac
>  }
> -retry_delay_ check_overwrite_prompt .1 5 || fail=1
> +retry_delay_ check_overwrite_prompt .1 7 || fail=1
>
>  kill $pid
>
> --
> 1.7.3.3
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#7704: [PATCH] tests: mv/i-3: avoid false-positive failure on	a slow/busy system
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Wed, 22 Dec 2010 12:04:22 +0100
>
>
>
>
> Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> > Hello Jim.
> >
> > On Wednesday 22 December 2010, Jim Meyering wrote:
> >> > Subject: [PATCH] tests: mv/i-3: avoid false-positive failure on a 
> >> > slow/busy system
> >>
> >> Whoops.  Since this is just an FYI patch,
> >> I should have sent it to coreutils@, not bug-coreutils.
> >> Closing...
> >>
> >> close 7784
> >>
> > I guess you meant '7704' here.
>
> Good catch.  Thank you.
> Safer to append "-done" in the Cc line, which I've just done.
> Luckily, 7784 is not yet a valid bug number.
>
>
> --- End Message ---