emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Emacs-bug-tracker] bug#8606: closed (coreutils: du)


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [Emacs-bug-tracker] bug#8606: closed (coreutils: du)
Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 04:25:02 +0000

Your message dated Mon, 02 May 2011 21:24:50 -0700
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#8606: Works in 8.5 but broken from 8.10 onwards
has caused the GNU bug report #8606,
regarding coreutils: du
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
8606: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=8606
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: coreutils: du Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 17:38:21 +0200 User-agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.38-ARCH; KDE/4.6.2; i686; ; )
Dear coreutils team,

I have coreutils 8.11 installed on my system via Arch Linux packages and have 
experienced some unexpected behaviour of the "du" utility. When I execute

du -hs . .git

in a folder that contains some files and a subfolder named ".git" the output I 
get is

194M    .

The output I would expect is

194M    .
97M     .git

If I change the order of the arguments to read

du -hs .git .

I get the output

97M     .git
97M     .

which again is not the desired result and in fact wrong because the reported 
size for '.' is 97M whereas a simple `du -hs .` reveals the size of '.' as 
194M. It would be great if you could fix this bug or tell me what I did wrong 
here. :)

Keep up your great work!

Greetings from Germany, Edgar Kalkowski

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#8606: Works in 8.5 but broken from 8.10 onwards Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 21:24:50 -0700 User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110307 Fedora/3.1.9-0.39.b3pre.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.9
On 05/02/11 18:51, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> If this is indeed a bug, then I can try to cook a patch.

No, it's expected.  In the NEWS file, it's the first bug
fix listed under coreutils 8.6.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]