emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Emacs-bug-tracker] bug#3801: closed (23.0.96; Emacs manual: add index e


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [Emacs-bug-tracker] bug#3801: closed (23.0.96; Emacs manual: add index entry for "notation, keys" or "key notation")
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 02:53:02 +0000

Your message dated Wed, 13 Jul 2011 05:53:57 +0300
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#3801: 23.0.96; Emacs manual: add index entry for 
"notation, keys" or "key notation"
has caused the GNU bug report #3801,
regarding 23.0.96; Emacs manual: add index entry for "notation, keys" or "key 
notation"
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
3801: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3801
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: 23.0.96; Emacs manual: add index entry for "notation, keys" or "key notation" Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 14:19:30 -0700
I tried looking for the place in the Emacs manual where the notation
for key sequences (the one used in the doc) is described. I tried
`notation' and found there was only one match:
`gdb-use-colon-colon-notation'. Users should be able to find this by
looking for terms such as `notation' and `conventions'.
 

In GNU Emacs 23.0.96.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600)
 of 2009-07-09 on SOFT-MJASON
Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600
configured using `configure --with-gcc (3.4)'
 



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#3801: 23.0.96; Emacs manual: add index entry for "notation, keys" or "key notation" Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 05:53:57 +0300
> From: "Drew Adams" <address@hidden>
> Cc: <address@hidden>, <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 14:16:23 -0700
> 
> > > I don't see any place in the Emacs manual where we 
> > > introduce the notational conventions used.
> > 
> > Right.  It doesn't do that.
> 
> Glad we agree.  That's the bug.

Not necessarily.  It's marked "notabug".


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]