[debbugs-tracker] bug#9018: closed (ido-find-file vs. dedicated windows)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 11 Sep 2011 12:39:35 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: ido-find-file vs. dedicated windows
has caused the GNU bug report #9018,
regarding ido-find-file vs. dedicated windows
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
9018: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=9018
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> ido-find-file vs. dedicated windows
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Thu, 7 Jul 2011 16:26:55 +0200
>
>
>
>
> Version: 24.0.50
> Package: emacs
> X-Debbugs-CC: address@hidden
>
>
> Recently, `find-file' was changed to use `pop-to-buffer-same-window'
> instead of `switch-to-buffer':
>
>
> revno: 104946
> fixes bug(s): http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=8911
> committer: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> branch nick: trunk
> timestamp: Mon 2011-07-04 12:08:16 -0400
> message:
>   * lisp/files.el (find-file): Use pop-to-buffer-same-window.
>   [...]
>
> === modified file 'lisp/files.el'
> --- lisp/files.el       2011-07-03 01:48:07 +0000
> +++ lisp/files.el       2011-07-04 16:08:16 +0000
> @@ -1341,8 +1341,8 @@
>                          (confirm-nonexistent-file-or-buffer)))
>    (let ((value (find-file-noselect filename nil nil wildcards)))
>      (if (listp value)
> -       (mapcar 'switch-to-buffer (nreverse value))
> -      (switch-to-buffer value))))
> +       (mapcar #'pop-to-buffer-same-window (nreverse value))
> +      (pop-to-buffer-same-window value))))
>
>  (defun find-file-other-window (filename &optional wildcards)
>    "Edit file FILENAME, in another window.
>
>
>
> which has the (intended) effect that
>
> M-: (set-window-dedicated-p (selected-window) t) <RET>
> C-x C-f some-file <RET>
>
> pops another window instead of failing with "Cannot switch buffers in
> a dedicated window".
>
> However, the ido replacement, `ido-find-file', does not call
> `find-file' but `find-file-noselect', so it fails.
>
>     Juanma
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: ido-find-file vs. dedicated windows
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Sun, 11 Sep 2011 12:39:35 +0200
>
>
>
>
> > The window code was rewritten again, I think.  Is this still a problem?
>
> No, it works as expected.
>
> Thanks,
>
>     Juanma
>
>
> --- End Message ---