emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#8795: closed (24.0.50; `completion-try-completion'


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#8795: closed (24.0.50; `completion-try-completion' addition of METADATA arg)
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 21:29:02 +0000

Your message dated Wed, 12 Oct 2011 17:28:30 -0400
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#8795: 24.0.50; `completion-try-completion' addition of 
METADATA arg
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #8795,
regarding 24.0.50; `completion-try-completion' addition of METADATA arg
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
8795: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=8795
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: 24.0.50; `completion-try-completion' addition of METADATA arg Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 10:44:58 -0700
1. The addition of arg METADATA, without making it optional, breaks
existing code that calls the function with only the first four args.
 
What value of METADATA should be passed to get the equivalent of the
behavior prior to the addition of this arg?  nil?
 
How about making this arg optional, so user code does not need to
special-case Emacs 24 wrt Emacs 23?


2. The METADATA arg is not even described in the doc string.
Users have no way to know how to fix the code this breaks.
Please describe the arg in the doc string.

In GNU Emacs 24.0.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600)
 of 2011-05-31 on 3249CTO
Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600
configured using `configure --with-gcc (4.5) --no-opt --cflags
-Ic:/build/include'
 




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#8795: 24.0.50; `completion-try-completion' addition of METADATA arg Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 17:28:30 -0400 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux)
> Still no doc for arg METADATA.

Indeed.  I have no intention to add any doc for it.  It's obvious from
context, and this is an internal function.


        Stefan


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]