emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#10486: closed (Patch: Fix case in identifiers star


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#10486: closed (Patch: Fix case in identifiers starting sentences in doc/r5rs/r5rs.texi)
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 13:50:05 +0000

Your message dated Thu, 02 Feb 2012 12:29:44 +0100
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#10486: Patch: Fix case in identifiers starting 
sentences in doc/r5rs/r5rs.texi
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #10486,
regarding Patch: Fix case in identifiers starting sentences in 
doc/r5rs/r5rs.texi
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
10486: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=10486
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Patch: Fix case in identifiers starting sentences in doc/r5rs/r5rs.texi Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 11:11:50 -0500 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux)
The GNU coding standards advise sticking with proper case for
identifiers, even if the identifier starts with a lowercase letter and
appears at the beginning of a sentence.

The Guile manual seems to follow this convention, with the exception of
r5rs.texi, hence the attached patch.

Attachment: 0001-Fix-case-in-identifiers-starting-sentences-in-doc-r5.patch
Description: Fix case in identifiers starting sentences in doc/r5rs/r5rs.texi


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#10486: Patch: Fix case in identifiers starting sentences in doc/r5rs/r5rs.texi Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 12:29:44 +0100 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux)
On Thu 12 Jan 2012 17:11, Bake Timmons <address@hidden> writes:

> The GNU coding standards advise sticking with proper case for
> identifiers, even if the identifier starts with a lowercase letter and
> appears at the beginning of a sentence.
>
> The Guile manual seems to follow this convention, with the exception of
> r5rs.texi, hence the attached patch.

Applied, thanks.  Note that as R5RS is a historical document, we
probably won't be accepting textual changes to this file, though you
probably knew that already.

Andy
-- 
http://wingolog.org/


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]