emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#10517: closed (Corrected patch: Make notation for


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#10517: closed (Corrected patch: Make notation for Scheme variable-length arguments more consistent in manual.)
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 19:29:05 +0000

Your message dated Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:05:09 +0100
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#10517: Corrected patch: Make notation for Scheme 
variable-length arguments more consistent in manual.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #10517,
regarding Corrected patch: Make notation for Scheme variable-length arguments 
more consistent in manual.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
10517: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=10517
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Corrected patch: Make notation for Scheme variable-length arguments more consistent in manual. Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 14:49:21 -0500 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux)
I'm sorry for that previous patch which included some typos.  The fixed
patch is attached.  Thanks!

Attachment: 0001-Make-notation-for-Scheme-repeated-arguments-more-con.patch
Description: Make notation for Scheme variable-length arguments more consistent in manual


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#10517: Corrected patch: Make notation for Scheme variable-length arguments more consistent in manual. Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:05:09 +0100 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux)
On Sun 15 Jan 2012 20:49, Bake Timmons <address@hidden> writes:

> I'm sorry for that previous patch which included some typos.  The fixed
> patch is attached.  Thanks!

Hum, I had applied your original patch already, resolving a conflict due
to the Parameters move; saw one typo in srfi-modules.texi and fixed it.
Hope that was OK.

In the future it's best to either use the same bug, by replying to the
mail that debbugs sends you, or to close the previous bug.  That way
people can opportunistically deal with one bug without having to look at
all bugs :-)

Cheers,

Andy
-- 
http://wingolog.org/


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]