|
From: | GNU bug Tracking System |
Subject: | [debbugs-tracker] bug#10967: closed (Weird 'du' behavior. Bug in coreutils-8.15 ?) |
Date: | Fri, 09 Mar 2012 07:23:02 +0000 |
Your message dated Fri, 09 Mar 2012 08:21:35 +0100 with message-id <address@hidden> and subject line Re: bug#10967: Weird 'du' behavior. Bug in coreutils-8.15 ? has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #10967, regarding Weird 'du' behavior. Bug in coreutils-8.15 ? to be marked as done. (If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact address@hidden) -- 10967: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=10967 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message ---Subject: Weird 'du' behavior. Bug in coreutils-8.15 ? ┌─[01:17:address@hidden Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 18:46:09 -0600
└─› mkdir /tmp/another_test/ && for i in $(seq 1 20); do dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/another_test/file-$i bs=1024 count=10240 ; done
┌─[01:17:address@hidden
└─› ls -1 /tmp/another_test/* | wc -l
20
┌─[01:17:address@hidden
└─› du -csxh /tmp/another_test/*
0 total
┌─[01:28:address@hidden
└─› du --version
du (GNU coreutils) 8.15
Copyright (C) 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>.
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.
Written by Torbjörn Granlund, David MacKenzie, Paul Eggert,
and Jim Meyering.
┌─[01:39:address@hidden
└─› cat /etc/issue
Arch Linux \r (\l)
┌─[01:39:address@hidden
└─› pacman -Qs coreutils
local/coreutils 8.15-1 (base)
with coreutils-8.14 du is working as expected.
strace => http://pastebin.com/dPAKCNwF
--An Educated Fool
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Subject: Re: bug#10967: Weird 'du' behavior. Bug in coreutils-8.15 ? Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 08:21:35 +0100 Pádraig Brady wrote: > On 03/08/2012 11:39 AM, Jim Meyering wrote: >> Pádraig Brady wrote: >>> On 03/08/2012 10:36 AM, Jim Meyering wrote: >> ... >>>> Subject: [PATCH] du: --one-file-system (-x) ignores non-directory arguments >>> >>> I find it a bit easier to parse if the summary describes >>> the change rather than the bug. So something like: >>> >>> du: fix -x to include non-directory arguments >> >> Thanks for the quick feedback. >> >> I see your point, but prefer not to use "include", because that >> might evoke du's --exclude or --exclude-from options. >> How about this? >> >> du: fix -x: don't ignore non-directory arguments > > perfect With that, I pushed yesterday and am closing the ticket now.
--- End Message ---
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |