[debbugs-tracker] bug#10859: closed (1.11a head on OSX Lion with Clang - 173 fails 87 skips of 2854 tests)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:12:36 +0100
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#10859: Automake 1.11a on OSX Lion with Clang
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #10859,
regarding 1.11a head on OSX Lion with Clang - 173 fails 87 skips of 2854 tests
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
10859: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=10859
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems

--- Begin Message --- Subject: 1.11a head on OSX Lion with Clang - 173 fails 87 skips of 2854 tests Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 20:41:39 +0000 (GMT)

 
Thanks for your help with the previous reports.

This is my report for testing the automake development trunk, 1.11a,
on an Apple with the latest developer tools from XCode-4.3, using
the Clang compiler.  Another report will be forthcoming for tests
using the llvm-gcc compiler against HEAD (only 4 fails).

Here are the details:

    Intel Core i5 iMac
    OSX Lion 10.7.3
    clang-3.1 (318)
    automake-1.11a
    autoconf-2.68
    gawk-4.0.0
    libtool-2.4.2
    lzip-1.12
    lzlib-1.2
    gfortran-4.6.2
    gettext-0.18.1.1
    deja-gnu-1.5
    git-1.7.9.1

I think that's what it uses, though I can't get it to find gfortran, when
I made a nice symlink for it in /usr/local/bin/gfortran

These tests were running fine with only a few fails, but it came to a
chunk of gcc tests and blew up.  Let me know if you have some time
to craft a patch and would like another go.

test-suite-clang-HEAD.log
Description: Binary data

--- End Message ---

> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#10859: Automake 1.11a on OSX Lion with Clang
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:12:36 +0100
>
>
>
>
> On 03/18/2012 08:58 PM, P. Martin wrote:
> >
> > 2) The second one I was giving you a few days to see if you changed it
> > before I brought it up :-)
> > 
> >     FAIL: python-pr10995.test
> >     aclocal: warning: 'configure.ac' and 'configure.in' both present.
> > 
> > 
> Oops, my bad, I've introduced this issue in a recent merge from maint.
> Fixed now (together with other similar issues).
>
> Given that the only other remaining failure is due to a bug/problem with
> the older Texinfo itself, I'm now closing this bug report (yay!)
>
> Thanks for all your testing, and best regards,
>   Stefano
>
>
> --- End Message ---