emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#11117: closed (Suggestion to mark the the arrow fo


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#11117: closed (Suggestion to mark the the arrow for translation)
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 08:43:02 +0000

Your message dated Thu, 29 Mar 2012 09:10:13 +0100
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#11117: Suggestion to mark the the arrow for translation
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #11117,
regarding Suggestion to mark the the arrow for translation
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
11117: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=11117
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Suggestion to mark the the arrow for translation Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 22:38:30 +0200
When printing a symbolic link in ls, the target of the link is printed
like this:

      if (f->linkname)
        {
          DIRED_FPUTS_LITERAL (" -> ", stdout);
          print_name_with_quoting (f, true, NULL, (p - buf) + w + 4);

I would suggest marking the arrow for translation.

          DIRED_FPUTS_LITERAL (_(" -> "), stdout);

In translations using Unicode a "real" arrow, the "rightwards arrow"
(U+2192), can be used instead of the "ascii art arrow" traditionally
used.



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#11117: Suggestion to mark the the arrow for translation Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 09:10:13 +0100 User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110816 Thunderbird/6.0
tags 11117 notabug

On 03/29/2012 07:03 AM, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 03/28/2012 01:38 PM, Göran Uddeborg wrote:
> 
>>           DIRED_FPUTS_LITERAL (_(" -> "), stdout);
> 
> Enough programs expect '->' that it may be wise to leave it alone.
> Also, POSIX requires that 'ls' use '->', and does
> not allow 'ls' to use '→' in any locale.
> 
> I like the nicer arrows, though.  Perhaps 'ls' could output
> them if given a new option (here I duck and run....).

This came up a couple of times already,
so I'm marking this as "done".

http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2009-08/msg00023.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2009-09/msg00096.html

Note '→' often displays less clearly with monospace fonts
used on terminals.

cheers,
Pádraig.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]