[debbugs-tracker] bug#11346: closed (automake-1.12 - one test fails (due to truncated timestamp))

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 26 Apr 2012 12:40:15 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#11346: automake-1.12 - one test fails (due to 
truncated timestamp)
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #11346,
regarding automake-1.12 - one test fails (due to truncated timestamp)
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
11346: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=11346
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> automake-1.12 - one test fails (due to truncated timestamp)
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Thu, 26 Apr 2012 10:26:10 +0200 (CEST)
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Alpine 2.00 (LNX 1167 2008-08-23)
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I just fetched automake-1.12, built it on our no-distro x86-linux-gnu
> system
>
>   uname -r: 2.6.28.6-x86_64 (most binaries are 32-bit)
>   /lib/libc-2.3.6.so
>   /lib64/libc-2.3.6.so
>
> and got one test suite failure.
>
>   FAIL: t/self-check-is_newest.tap 19 - is_newest u x
>
> It seems that 'touch -r x u' (on jfs) has truncated the timestamp, but I
> have also seen timestamps rounded upwards to the next second (I think).
>
> Therefore I would suggest to replace
>   touch -r x u
> in self-check-is_newest.tap by
>   touch -r x x; touch -r x u
> such that x's time first gets rounded (up or down) to the next second and
> then transferred to u.
>
> Regards
> Peter Breitenlohner <address@hidden>
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#11346: automake-1.12 - one test fails (due to truncated	timestamp)
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Thu, 26 Apr 2012 12:40:15 +0200
>
>
>
>
> On 04/26/2012 11:38 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> >  Will push shortly then.
> > 
> Pushed now.  I'm thus closing this bug report.
>
> Thanks,
>   Stefano
>
>
> --- End Message ---