[debbugs-tracker] bug#11663: closed (Incorrect regexp match with explicitly numbered blocks )

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2012 10:55:23 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#11663: Incorrect regexp match with explicitly numbered 
blocks
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #11663,
regarding Incorrect regexp match with explicitly numbered blocks 
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
11663: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=11663
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Incorrect regexp match with explicitly numbered blocks 
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Sat, 09 Jun 2012 23:26:28 +0200
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.130004 (Ma Gnus v0.4) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> Hi, 
>
> Assume this buffer's text. M-x regexp-builder and try this regexp
> "\\(?:^Hi\\)" which works correctly. Modify to "\\(?2:^Hi\\)" and you
> will see that ^ is taken literally and does not match bol anymore.
>
> I've tried this in emacs 23 and on GNU Emacs 24.1.50.1
> (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.4.2) of 2012-06-08 on lakoocha,
> modified by Debian.
>
> Vitalie.
>
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#11663: Incorrect regexp match with explicitly numbered blocks
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Sun, 10 Jun 2012 10:55:23 +0200
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> Thanks for the report.  The problem was that at_begline_loc_p wasn't
> updated when the `(?N:' syntax was added.  I have also fixed a problem
> with preceding backslashes that causes the ^ in patterns like "\\\\(^a)"
> to be incorrectly taken non-literally.
>
> Andreas.
>
> -- 
> Andreas Schwab, address@hidden
> GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
> "And now for something completely different."
>
>
> --- End Message ---