emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#11673: closed (loading cl no longer defines compil


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#11673: closed (loading cl no longer defines compiler macros for caddr etc)
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 21:01:03 +0000

Your message dated Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:57:47 -0400
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#11673: loading cl no longer defines compiler macros 
for caddr etc
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #11673,
regarding loading cl no longer defines compiler macros for caddr etc
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
11673: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=11673
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: loading cl no longer defines compiler macros for caddr etc Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:26:23 -0400 User-agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/)
Package: emacs
Version: 24.1.50

For a few days, I see this failure when doing a -j8 bootstrap of the
trunk on GNU/Linux:

  In toplevel form:
  gnus/spam-report.el:31:1:Error: Symbol's function definition is void: caddr
  make[2]: *** [gnus/spam-report.elc] Error 1


In 24.1:

emacs-24.1 -Q -l cl -l bytecomp

C-h f caddr

   -> This function has a compiler macro.

Repeating this in current trunk does not seem to define a compiler macro.



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#11673: loading cl no longer defines compiler macros for caddr etc Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:57:47 -0400 User-agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/)
Version: 24.1.50

Stefan Monnier wrote:

> Should be fixed now, but please confirm,
>
>> C-h f caddr
>> -> This function has a compiler macro.
>> Repeating this in current trunk does not seem to define a compiler macro.
>
> And this should be fixed as well,

Works for me; thanks.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]