The very old factoring code cut from an now obsolete version GMP does not pass proper arguments to the mpz_probab_prime_p function. It ask for 3 Miller-Rabin tests only, which is not sufficient. I am afraid the original poor code was wrritten by me, where this particular problem was introduced with 3.0's demos/factorize.c. A Miller-Rabin test will detect composites with at least a probability of 3/4. For a uniform random composite, the probability will actually by much higher. Or put another way, of the N-3 possible Miller-Rabin tests for checking the composite N, there is no number N for which more than (N-3)/4 of the tests will fail to detect the number as a composite. For most numbers N the number of "false witnesses" will be much, much lower. Problem numbers are of the for N=pq, p,q prime and (p-1)/(q-1) = s, where s is a small integer. (There are other problem forms too, incvolving 3 or more prime factors.) When s = 2, we get the 3/4 factor. It is easy to find numbers of that form that causes coreutils factor to fail: 465658903 2242724851 6635692801 17709149503 17754345703 20889169003 42743470771 54890944111 72047131003 85862644003 98275842811 114654168091 117225546301 ... There are 9008992 composites of the form with s=2 below 2^64. With 3 Miller-Rabin test, one would expect about 9008992/4^64 = 140766 to be invalidly recognised as primes in that range. Here is a simple patch:
diff
Description: Binary data
I and Niels Möller have written a suggested replacement for coreutils
factor.c. It fixes a number of issues with the current code:
(1) Much faster trial division code (> 10x) based on a small table of
prime inverses. Still, the new code doesn't perform lots of trial
dividing.
(2) Pollard rho code using Montgomery representation for numbers < 2^64.
(We consider extending this to 128 bits.) Not dependent on GMP.
(3) Lucas prime proving code instead of probablitic Miller-Rabin primes
testing.
(4) SQUFOF code, which might be included depending on performance
issues.
(5) Replacement GMP code (#if HAVE_GMP) that also includes Lucas proving
code.
The new code is faster than the current code:
Old:
seq `pexpr 2^64-1000` `pexpr 2^64-1` | time factor >/dev/null
524.57 user
New:
seq `pexpr 2^64-1000` `pexpr 2^64-1` | time ./factor >/dev/null
0.05 user
For smaller number ranges, the improvements are currently much more
modest, as little as 2x in some cases.
The code should be ready within a few weeks.
--
Torbjörn
--- End Message ---