emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#12959: closed ("seq -w -1e-3 9" misaligned)


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#12959: closed ("seq -w -1e-3 9" misaligned)
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 09:31:02 +0000

Your message dated Fri, 23 Nov 2012 09:04:54 +0000
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#12959: "seq -w -1e-3 9" misaligned
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #12959,
regarding "seq -w -1e-3 9" misaligned
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
12959: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=12959
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: "seq -w -1e-3 9" misaligned Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 11:49:05 +0100 (CET)
Hi,

While the output of (1) "seq -w -1e-2 9" prints the width as expected, the 
output of (2) "seq -w -1e-3 9" does not:
 (1) vs. (2)
-0.01 | -0.001
00.99 | 0.999
01.99 | 1.999
02.99 | 2.999
03.99 | 3.999
04.99 | 4.999
05.99 | 5.999
06.99 | 6.999
07.99 | 7.999
08.99 | 8.999

Similarly, see "seq -w -1e2 -98" vs. "seq -w -1e3 -998".

Can you kindly confirm that the bug was introduced 4 years ago in the following 
commit: 
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=coreutils.git;a=commitdiff;h=86e4b778b148bdd82395fdc312ce8d937f303e33

Best regards,
 Marcel




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#12959: "seq -w -1e-3 9" misaligned Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 09:04:54 +0000 User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120615 Thunderbird/13.0.1
On 11/22/2012 10:58 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 11/22/2012 10:49 AM, Marcel Böhme wrote:
Hi,

While the output of (1) "seq -w -1e-2 9" prints the width as expected, the output of (2) 
"seq -w -1e-3 9" does not:
  (1) vs. (2)
-0.01 | -0.001
00.99 | 0.999
01.99 | 1.999
02.99 | 2.999
03.99 | 3.999
04.99 | 4.999
05.99 | 5.999
06.99 | 6.999
07.99 | 7.999
08.99 | 8.999

Similarly, see "seq -w -1e2 -98" vs. "seq -w -1e3 -998".

Can you kindly confirm that the bug was introduced 4 years ago in the following 
commit: 
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=coreutils.git;a=commitdiff;h=86e4b778b148bdd82395fdc312ce8d937f303e33

Confirmed:

$ ~/git/coreutils/src/seq -w -1e-3 1
-0.001
0.999

$ ~/git/coreutils/src/seq -w -.001 1
-0.001
00.999

The attached should fix this.

thanks,
Pádraig.

Attachment: seq-w-e.diff
Description: Text Data


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]