[debbugs-tracker] bug#13225: closed (24.3.50; Non-selected window has not mode-line-inactive face)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 04 Jan 2013 03:28:25 -0500
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#13225: 24.3.50; Non-selected window has not 
mode-line-inactive face
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #13225,
regarding 24.3.50; Non-selected window has not mode-line-inactive face
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
13225: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=13225
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> 24.3.50; Non-selected window has not mode-line-inactive face
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Wed, 19 Dec 2012 09:12:15 +0100
>
>
>
>
> With emacs -Q do C-x 5 2.  The mode lines of both windows appear in
> `mode-line' face, regardless of which window is selected.
>
> This contradicts the Elisp manual which says:
>
>       The selected window's mode line is usually displayed in a different
>    color using the face `mode-line'.  Other windows' mode lines appear in
>    the face `mode-line-inactive' instead.
>
>
> In GNU Emacs 24.3.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600)
>  of 2012-12-19 on MACHNO
> Bzr revision: 111265 address@hidden
> Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600
> Configured using:
>  `configure --with-gcc (4.6) --no-opt'
>
> martin
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#13225: 24.3.50;	Non-selected window has not mode-line-inactive face
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Fri, 04 Jan 2013 03:28:25 -0500
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/)
>
>
>
>
> martin rudalics wrote:
>
> > With emacs -Q do C-x 5 2.  The mode lines of both windows appear in
> > `mode-line' face, regardless of which window is selected.
>
> AFAICS, this is fixed.
>
> The remainder of the discussion seems too free-form to make a useful bug
> report, but please open a new one(s) summarising the issues if you
> disagree (or reopen this one).
>
>
> --- End Message ---