emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#8969: closed (improve synchronization between exam


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#8969: closed (improve synchronization between examples in the manual and test cases)
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 13:12:01 +0000

Your message dated Wed, 09 Jan 2013 14:10:41 +0100
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line close bug 8969
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #8969,
regarding improve synchronization between examples in the manual and test cases
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
8969: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=8969
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: improve synchronization between examples in the manual and test cases Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 00:39:12 +0200 User-agent: KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.30-2-686; KDE/4.4.4; i686; ; )
Severity: wishlist
thanks

Reference:
 <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2011-06/msg00220.html>

On Tuesday 28 June 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 08:24:13AM CEST:
> > On Monday 27 June 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > > Sure.  Well, do they use some format already?
> > >
> > Well, there are only two of them, and both follows this format:
> > 
> > @c The test case for the setup described here is
> > @c     test/subdircond2.test
> > @c Try to keep it in sync.
> > 
> > (which is wrongish BTW, as the testsuite subdirectory is `tests/',
> > not `test/')
> > 
> > I'd go with one of these simple formats:
> >   @c Keep in sync with subdircond2.test
> 
> I like this one (with a trailing dot ;-)
> 
> ;-)
> 
I'll soon post a patch that improves the synchronization between
some examples from the manual and some test cases.  In the process
of writing it, I've noticed that various non-trivial examples from
the manual are not tested; and while I've remedied to part of this
problem with my patch, a lot remains to be done; so I'm opening
this bug to avoid forgetting about the issue.

Regards,
  Stefano



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: close bug 8969 Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 14:10:41 +0100
Reference:
<http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=8969>

One and a half year ago, I wrote :

> I'll soon post a patch that improves the synchronization between
> some examples from the manual and some test cases.  In the process
> of writing it, I've noticed that various non-trivial examples from
> the manual are not tested; and while I've remedied to part of this
> problem with my patch, a lot remains to be done; so I'm opening
> this bug to avoid forgetting about the issue.

I now think that keeping a bug report open about this is overkill,
and introduce more noise rather than helping out.  So, since the
referenced patch has been since long written and applied, and the
issues originally spotted have been fixed, I'm closing the report.

Regards,
  Stefano


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]