emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#13453: closed (comm)


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#13453: closed (comm)
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 02:59:02 +0000

Your message dated Tue, 15 Jan 2013 17:07:01 -0700
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#13453: comm
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #13453,
regarding comm
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
13453: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=13453
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: comm Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 16:37:21 -0600

Hello there,

 

Not really a bug per se, but a nice feature would be if a check was done to just sort the given files before hand.  If you don’t sort it, you will get undesired output, and this would be a good safety check.

 

Thanks.



Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer does not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of my firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#13453: comm Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 17:07:01 -0700 User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2
tag 13453 notabug
thanks

On 01/15/2013 03:37 PM, Dennis Miller wrote:
> Hello there,
> 
> Not really a bug per se,

Still, by sending a message to bug-coreutils, you've opened a bug track
id.  That is okay for feature requests (a new feature request is
arguably a bug of a missing functionality); but if you don't need to
spawn a bug id, then sending mail to address@hidden is better.

> but a nice feature would be if a check was done to just sort the given files 
> before hand.

What version of coreutils are you using?  This functionality is already
present in modern coreutils - by default, comm warns you if it gets
confused because the file is not in sorted order; comm --check-order
warns you in even more situations; and comm --nocheck-order silences the
default check.

> Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.

Unfortunately, this mail is now publicly archived, rendering this
disclaimer unenforceable.  It is considered poor netiquette to tack on
your employer's disclaimers to public lists, and we recommend using
personal email accounts to avoid the problem.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]