[debbugs-tracker] bug#13021: closed (24.2.90; compile eval-after-load form)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 20 Jun 2013 00:55:27 +0100 (BST)
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#13021: 24.2.90; compile eval-after-load form
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #13021,
regarding 24.2.90; compile eval-after-load form
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
13021: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=13021
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> 24.2.90; compile eval-after-load form
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Wed, 28 Nov 2012 15:05:56 +0000 (GMT)
>
>
>
>
> severity: wishlist
>
> I think it is a good idea to compile the form that is passed to
> eval-after-load.  The advantage is that one gets compiler warnings and
> errors and the form itself is executed faster.
>
> This is what I use:
>
>     (defmacro eal (package &rest forms)
>       (declare (indent 1) (debug t))
>       `(,(if (if (symbolp package)
>                  (require package nil t)
>                (load package t t))
>              'progn
>            (message "eal: cannot find %s" package)
>            'with-no-warnings)
>         (eval-after-load ',package
>           `(funcall (function ,(lambda () ,@forms))))))
>
> This is what Michael (Heerdegen) uses:
>
>     (defun-safe init-file-eval-after-load (file &rest forms)
>       "Like `eval-after-load', but byte-compile FORMS before eval."
>       (eval-after-load file `(let ((byte-compile-log-buffer "*Warnings*")
>                                    (byte-compile-current-form
>                                     (format "`init-file-eval-after-load': %s" 
> ',file)))
>                                (funcall (byte-compile (lambda () ,@forms))))))
>
> Could vanilla eval-after-load be modified so it compiles the form?  I am
> thinking of an optional third parameter, one that allows to either keep
> the current behaviour (default), load the package & compile the form at
> compile time or compile the form at run-time before evaling.
>
> WDYT?
>
>         Christopher
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#13021: 24.2.90; compile eval-after-load form
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Thu, 20 Jun 2013 00:55:27 +0100 (BST)
>
>
>
>
> Christopher Schmidt <address@hidden> writes:
> > I think it is a good idea to compile the form that is passed to
> > eval-after-load.
>
> There is with-eval-after-load now.
>
>         Christopher
>
>
> --- End Message ---