[debbugs-tracker] bug#14712: closed (24.3.50; `isearch-filter-visible' obsolescence)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 25 Jun 2013 14:31:00 -0400
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#14712: 24.3.50; `isearch-filter-visible' obsolescence
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #14712,
regarding 24.3.50; `isearch-filter-visible' obsolescence
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
14712: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=14712
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> 24.3.50; `isearch-filter-visible' obsolescence
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Tue, 25 Jun 2013 09:49:25 -0700 (PDT)
>
>
>
>
> I use `isearch-filter-visible' in my code.  Recently, you have made it
> obsolete.  The `make-obsolete' sexp is not helpful/accurate, AFAICT.  It
> says only that `isearch-filter-visible' is replaced by
> `isearch-invisible':
>
> (make-obsolete 'isearch-filter-visible 'isearch-invisible "24.4")
>
> That is definitely not true.  For one thing, the former is a function
> and the latter is a variable.
>
> The proper replacement is given in the source code:
>
> (or (eq search-invisible t)
>     (not (isearch-range-invisible beg end)))
>
> It is that information that needs to be conveyed in the obsolescence
> message.
>
>
>
>
>
> In GNU Emacs 24.3.50.1 (i686-pc-mingw32)
>  of 2013-06-20 on ODIEONE
> Bzr revision: 113100 address@hidden
> Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 6.1.7601
> Configured using:
>  `configure --prefix=/c/Devel/emacs/binary --enable-checking=yes,glyphs
>  CFLAGS=-O0 -g3 LDFLAGS=-Lc:/Devel/emacs/lib
>  CPPFLAGS=-Ic:/Devel/emacs/include'
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#14712: 24.3.50; `isearch-filter-visible' obsolescence
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Tue, 25 Jun 2013 14:31:00 -0400
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> tags 14712 notabug
> thanks
>
> > The proper replacement is given in the source code:
>
> > (or (eq search-invisible t)
> >     (not (isearch-range-invisible beg end)))
>
> > It is that information that needs to be conveyed in the obsolescence
> > message.
>
> No, the obsolescence message only points to the other
> variable/function/feature with which you can obtain similar results.
> It's generally not a drop-in replacement.
>
>
>         Stefan
>
>
> --- End Message ---