emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#13291: closed (The package description buffer need


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#13291: closed (The package description buffer needs an URL button)
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 03:46:02 +0000

Your message dated Mon, 07 Oct 2013 06:45:36 +0300
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#13291: The package description buffer needs an URL 
button
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #13291,
regarding The package description buffer needs an URL button
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
13291: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=13291
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: The package description buffer needs an URL button Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 18:39:19 +0400 User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 We can get the addresses from the semi-standard URL header, it's mentioned on these two pages, so at least some people are using it:

http://emacswiki.org/emacs/AutomaticFileHeaders
http://marmalade-repo.org/doc-files/package.5.html#SINGLE-FILE-PACKAGES

Plus, when the header's absent, the package repository can try to add the field automatically. Melpa can derive it from the recipe settings, and GNU Elpa can at least show links to the repository browser. Or maybe to the pages at elpa.gnu.org. They basically contain the same information as the description buffer, though, so probably not.

Also see https://github.com/milkypostman/melpa/issues/424.

Any opposing opinions?

--Dmitry



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#13291: The package description buffer needs an URL button Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 06:45:36 +0300 User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0
On 03.10.2013 16:46, Stefan Monnier wrote:
That's too bad, I'd rather not reimplement the alist-to-plist and
plist-to-alist code from package.el.

You can copy&paste it.

Okay, done, thanks for the reality check.

Patch installed, now let's see how it works live.



--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]